Peripartum Anesthetic Management Research Articles

Peripartum anesthetic management in patients with left ventricular noncompaction: a case series and review of the literature

BackgroundThis retrospective review focuses on peripartum anesthetic management and outcome of a series of five pregnant women with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). MethodsThe Mayo Clinic Advanced Cohort Explorer medical database was utilized to identify women diagnosed with LVNC who had been admitted for delivery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, between January 2001 and September 2021. Echocardiograms were independently reviewed by two board-certified echocardiographers, and those determined by both to meet the Jenni criteria and/or having compatible findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for information pertaining to cardiac function, labor, delivery, and postpartum management. ResultsWe identified 44 patients whose medical record included the term “noncompaction” or “hypertrabeculation” and who had delivered at our institution during the study period. Upon detailed review of the medical records, 36 did not meet criteria for LVNC, and three additional patients did not receive the diagnosis until after delivery, leaving five patients with confirmed LVNC who had undergone six deliveries during the study interval. All five patients had a history of arrhythmias or had developed arrhythmias during pregnancy. One patient underwent emergency cesarean delivery due to sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring three intra-operative cardioversions. ConclusionsThis case series adds new evidence to that already available about pregnancies among women with LVNC. Favorable obstetrical outcomes were achievable when multidisciplinary teams were prepared to manage the maternal and fetal consequences of intrapartum cardiac arrhythmias and hemodynamic instability.

Peripartum anesthetic management of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight medical centers across three European countries: prospective cohort observation study

Objective Several reports of obstetric anesthesia management have been published since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to collect high-quality broad and detailed data from different university medical centers in several European Society of Anesthesiologist countries. Methods This prospective observational survey was performed in eight medical centers in Spain, Israel and Portugal from 1st April to 31st July 2020. Institutional review board approval was received at each participating center. Inclusion criteria: all women with a positive test for COVID-19. Retrieved data included maternal, delivery, anesthetic, postpartum details, and neonatal outcomes. Descriptive data are presented, and outcomes were compared for women with versus without respiratory signs and symptoms. Results Women with respiratory symptoms (20/12.1%) had significantly higher mean (standard deviation) temperature (37.2 °C (0.8) versus 36.8 °C (0.6)), were older (34.1 (6.7) years versus 30.5 (6.6)) and had higher body mass index kg m−2 – (29.5 (7.5) versus 28.2 (5.1)). Women with respiratory symptoms delivered at a significantly earlier gestational age (50% < 37 weeks) with a 65% cesarean delivery rate (versus 22.1% in the group without respiratory symptoms) and 5-fold increased rate of emergency cesarean delivery, 30% performed under general anesthesia. A higher rate of intrauterine fetal death (3%) was observed than expected from the literature (0.2–0.3%) in developed countries. There was no evidence of viral vertical transmission. Conclusion Well-functioning neuraxial analgesia should be available to manage laboring women with respiratory symptoms, as there is a higher frequency of emergency cesarean delivery. We report a higher rate of undiagnosed parturient and intrauterine fetal death.

Areview of 92 obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the Bronx, New York and their peripartum anaesthetic management.

The Bronx is a borough of New York City that has been profoundly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited reports exist discussing the anaesthetic management of obstetric patients infected with COVID-19. We review a cohort of obstetric patients in the Bronx with COVID-19 and report their delivery data, anaesthetic management, and maternal-fetal outcomes. We reviewed 92 pregnant patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who delivered between 1 February 2020 and 1 May 2020. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, anaesthetic management, and clinical outcomes. Patients were stratified by mode of delivery and COVID-19 disease severity. Of the 92 deliveries, 49 (53%) were vaginal, 14 (15%) were scheduled caesareans, and 29 (32%) were unscheduled caesareans. 64 patients (70%) were asymptomatic for COVID-19 (mild disease: 18 patients [19%], moderate disease: 7 patients [8%], severe disease: 2 patients [2%], critical disease: 1 patient [1%]). 83 patients (90%) received neuraxial analgesia and/or anaesthesia, with combined spinal-epidural (CSE) and dural puncture epidural (DPE) as the most common techniques. 5 patients (5%) required general anaesthesia (GA) for caesarean delivery, 3 (3%) of whom were intubated for severe or critical COVID-19 disease. Given the risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission, GA was avoided in all but the most critically ill patients. CSE and DPE were optimal for minimizing catheter failure rates and risk of conversion to GA. SARS-CoV-2 infection in obstetric patients may be associated with an increased risk for adverse outcomes including preeclampsia, preterm delivery, unscheduled caesarean delivery, and mechanical ventilation.

Peripartum anesthetic management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, a retrospective case-control study

ObjectiveInflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a group of pathologies associated with an increased rate of abortions, premature deliveries, cesarean sections and other morbidity during the peripartum period. The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the anesthetic management for delivery of women with IBD. Material and methodsThe records of patients with IBD, who delivered at our Center, were obtained for data which included anesthetic and obstetric management as well as neonatal outcome. Five subgroups were defined based on mode of delivery, presence or absence of epidural in normal vaginal delivery (NVD) and urgency of cesarean section, each of which was compared with control groups of healthy parturients in the same period. Additionally, the rate of cesarean sections and the use of epidural analgesia for NVD were compared with the general obstetric population of our center in the same period. Results107 patients with IBD who delivered at our center were studied. The rates of cesarean sections and emergency cesarean sections were significantly higher compared to the general population. However, the rate of instrumental delivery and of epidural analgesia use for NVD were similar. Among those who underwent cesarean sections, no significant differences were found in anesthesia type, surgery duration, number of complications, type of monitoring or postoperative management compared to the control group. ConclusionPeripartum anesthetic management of patients with IBD does not differ significantly from that of parturients without it. Anesthesiologists can plan their anesthesia in a similar way as they do in healthy parturients.

Management of eight labor and delivery patients dependent on buprenorphine (Subutex™): A retrospective chart review

Background: Opioid use during pregnancy is a growing concern in the United States. Buprenorphine has been recommended by “The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology” as an alternative to methadone to decrease risks associated with the use of illicit opioids during pregnancy. The partial μ-opioid agonists’ unique pharmacology, including its long half time and high affinity to the μ-opioid receptor, complicates patient management in a highly kinetic, and often urgent field like obstetric anesthesia. We reviewed our management and outcomes in this medically complex population. Methods: An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective chart review was conducted of women admitted to the University of Washington Medical Center Labor and Delivery unit from July 2012 to November 2013 using buprenorphine. All deliveries, including intrauterine fetal demise, were included. Results: Eight women were admitted during this period to our L&amp;D floor on buprenorphine. All required peri-partum anesthetic management either for labor and/or cesarean delivery management. Analgesic management included dilaudid or fentanyl PCA and/or continued epidural infusion, and in one instance ketamine infusion, while the pre-admission buprenorphine regimen was continued. Five babies were viable, two women experienced intrauterine fetal death at 22 and 36 weeks gestational age (GSA), respectively, and one neonate died shortly after delivery due to a congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Conclusions: This case series illuminates the medical complexity of parturients using buprenorphine. Different treatment modalities in the absence of evidence-based guidelines included additional opioid administration and continued epidural analgesia. The management of post-cesarean pain in patients on partial μ-opioid agonists remains complex and variable, and evidence-based guidelines could be useful for clinicians to direct care.

Management of eight labor and delivery patients dependent on buprenorphine (Subutex™): A retrospective chart review

Background: Opioid use during pregnancy is a growing concern in the United States. Buprenorphine has been recommended by “The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology” as an alternative to methadone to decrease risks associated with the use of illicit opioids during pregnancy. The partial μ-opioid agonists’ unique pharmacology, including its long half time and high affinity to the μ-opioid receptor, complicates patient management in a highly kinetic, and often urgent field like obstetric anesthesia. We reviewed our management and outcomes in this medically complex population. Methods: An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective chart review was conducted of women admitted to the University of Washington Medical Center Labor and Delivery unit from July 2012 to November 2013 using buprenorphine. All deliveries, including intrauterine fetal demise, were included. Results: Eight women were admitted during this period to our L&D floor on buprenorphine. All required peri-partum anesthetic management either for labor and/or cesarean delivery management. Analgesic management included dilaudid or fentanyl PCA and/or continued epidural infusion, and in one instance ketamine infusion, while the pre-admission buprenorphine regimen was continued. Five babies were viable, two women experienced intrauterine fetal death at 22 and 36 weeks gestational age (GSA), respectively, and one neonate died shortly after delivery due to a congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Conclusions: This case series illuminates the medical complexity of parturients using buprenorphine. Different treatment modalities in the absence of evidence-based guidelines included additional opioid administration and continued epidural analgesia. The management of post-cesarean pain in patients on partial μ-opioid agonists remains complex and variable, and evidence-based guidelines could be useful for clinicians to direct care.

Management of eight labor and delivery patients dependent on buprenorphine (Subutex™): A retrospective chart review.

Background: Opioid use during pregnancy is a growing concern in the United States. Buprenorphine has been recommended by "The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology" as an alternative to methadone to decrease risks associated with the use of illicit opioids during pregnancy. The partial μ-opioid agonists' unique pharmacology, including its long half time and high affinity to the μ-opioid receptor, complicates patient management in a highly kinetic, and often urgent field like obstetric anesthesia. We reviewed our management and outcomes in this medically complex population. Methods: An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved retrospective chart review was conducted of women admitted to the University of Washington Medical Center Labor and Delivery unit from July 2012 to November 2013 using buprenorphine. All deliveries, including intrauterine fetal demise, were included. Results: Eight women were admitted during this period to our L&D floor on buprenorphine. All required peri-partum anesthetic management either for labor and/or cesarean delivery management. Analgesic management included dilaudid or fentanyl PCA and/or continued epidural infusion, and in one instance ketamine infusion, while the pre-admission buprenorphine regimen was continued. Five babies were viable, two women experienced intrauterine fetal death at 22 and 36 weeks gestational age (GSA), respectively, and one neonate died shortly after delivery due to a congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Conclusions: This case series illuminates the medical complexity of parturients using buprenorphine. Different treatment modalities in the absence of evidence-based guidelines included additional opioid administration and continued epidural analgesia. The management of post-cesarean pain in patients on partial μ-opioid agonists remains complex and variable, and evidence-based guidelines could be useful for clinicians to direct care.

The Peripartum Anesthesiologist

The association between pregnancy and cardiomyopathy has been evident since 1870. Moreover, the incidence of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is thought to range from 1 in 2,400 to 1 in 15,000 pregnancies; however, a more recent review suggests an incidence of one in 3,000 to 4,000 pregnancies in western countries. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is more prevalent in older multiparous patients of African descent who have multiple gestations, chronic hypertension or preeclampsia, and have received prolonged tocolytic therapy. There are four principal diagnostic features of PPCM: the development of heart failure in the last month of pregnancy or within five months of delivery; absence of an identifiable cause; absence of underlying heart disease prior to the last month of pregnancy; and evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Recently, echocardiographic criteria were established, including an ejection fraction 45% and an end-diastolic dimension [ 2.72 cm m. Basic principal treatment of PPCM includes a reduction of both preload and afterload along with the administration of inotropic therapy. Severe cases may require mechanical support and consideration for heart transplantation. Delivery of the fetus is usually indicated when the cardiac failure is intractable. In this month’s edition of the Journal, Ituk et al. report on the peripartum anesthetic management and outcomes of 25 women with dilated cardiomyopathy four of whom were designated as having PPCM. With an average age of 32 and a history of hypertension and diabetes, these patients represent a higher risk group than the overall obstetrical population, which is in keeping with previous reports of PPCM risk factors. This challenging group of patients was optimally managed by a multidisciplinary team with a distinct knowledge of peripartum care a team that followed their patients’ clinical progress at regular multidisciplinary case conferences. Fetal delivery in PPCM is dictated by the obstetric indications and occurs in consultation with the anesthesia team. Vaginal delivery offers minimal blood loss, hemodynamic stability, and avoidance of additional Cesarean delivery-related surgical stresses with an overall reduced chance of postoperative complications. Regional anesthesia is advantageous for reducing preload and afterload and minimizing the fluctuations in cardiac output associated with labour. Cesarean delivery is best reserved for indications such as breech presentation, fetal distress, or failure to progress. Prognostic information of PPCM is limited and often confounded by the inclusion of patients with heart failure of differing etiologies. The reported mortality ranges from 18-50% and it increases as a function of age, ejection fraction 25%, multiparity, African American ethnicity, and delayed diagnosis. The recurrence rate of 50-100% is influenced by the severity of PPCM during the index pregnancy and by left ventricular systolic function at the beginning of pregnancy. Echocardiography may be helpful in delineating future risk in patients considering future pregnancies. Long-term prognosis is related to recovery of left ventricular function with 80% of women recovering partially or completely, and the remaining 20% either dying or undergo cardiac transplantation. In our view, the obstetric anesthesiologist functions as a vital member of the interdisciplinary team caring for women with complicated obstetric issues and, as such, A. Munro, MD R. B. George, MD (&) Department of Women’s & Obstetric Anesthesia, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada e-mail: rbgeorge@dal.ca

Peripartum Outcomes and Anaesthetic Management of Parturients With Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease or Pulmonary Hypertension

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of pregnancies among women with moderate to complex congenital heart disease or pulmonary hypertension over a 12-year period, resulting in a cohort of 107 cases in 65 women. Neuraxial analgesia or anaesthesia was provided in 84%, 89% and 95% of spontaneous vaginal, operative vaginal and caesarean deliveries, respectively. The caesarean delivery rate was 43% compared to our institution average of 27% over the same period (p = 0.02), and 38% had operative vaginal deliveries compared to a 10.5% institution rate (p < 0.01). Invasive monitoring was used in 28% of all deliveries. There were one maternal and two neonatal deaths. This study provides detailed anaesthetic and peripartum management of women with congenital heart disease, a patient population in whom evidence-based practice and data are largely lacking. We observed a predominance of neuraxial anaesthetic techniques, increased caesarean and operative delivery rates, and favourable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Multicentre studies and registries to compare anaesthetic and obstetric management strategies further and delineate risk factors for adverse outcomes are required.

Anesthetic Management of Parturients With a Fontan Circulation: A Review of Published Case Reports.

Parturients with Fontan physiology provide unique and complex challenges to anesthesiologists. Such challenges include the maintenance of a perfect balance between preload, pulmonary vascular resistance, afterload, and cardiac output in a setting of a single ventricle physiology. The physiological changes of pregnancy add additional burden to an already "fragile" physiology, making the anesthetic management for labor and/or cesarean delivery even more complex. Understanding the impact of these changes on the Fontan physiology and the effect of anesthetic choices on this dyad (pregnancy-Fontan) is an imperative prior to caring for these patients. In an effort to determine how these patients are best managed for labor and/or cesarean delivery, we have reviewed the literature examining the peripartum anesthetic management of parturients with Fontan circulation and have identified 27 case reports.

Anesthetic management and outcomes of parturients with dilated cardiomyopathy in an academic centre.

This study examines the peripartum anesthetic management and outcomes of women with dilated cardiomyopathy in a large university medical centre over a seven-year period. Twenty-five women were included in this series, 18 with a new diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and seven with a history of cardiomyopathy. Sixteen patients (64%) identified themselves as African American, seven (28%) were Caucasian, and two patients (8%) were Hispanic. The median (range) gestational age at the time of a new diagnosis of cardiomyopathy was 29 (7-38) weeks. Eight women (32%) had New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms at the time of delivery or in the immediate postpartum period. A multidisciplinary team of obstetricians, anesthesiologists, cardiologists, and pediatricians were involved in the care of these women. The median (range) gestational age at the time of delivery was 33.5 (30-40) weeks. There were nine vaginal deliveries and 15 operative deliveries. One patient had fetal loss at 19weeks gestation. Twelve women had labour induced with an intravenous infusion of oxytocin at a rate of 0.001-0.02IU·min(-1). An oxytocin infusion at a variable rate with a maximum dose of 0.05IU·min(-1) was administered after vaginal delivery to maintain uterine tone. Epidural analgesia was initiated prior to induction of labour or in the latent phase of labour. Seven Cesarean deliveries were performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, five were performed under epidural anesthesia, and three women had general anesthesia. Oxytocin was administered via an intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.05-0.2IU·min(-1) after operative delivery. One patient had a cardiac arrest on induction of general anesthesia and was successfully resuscitated. There were no maternal or neonatal deaths. Ten women were followed up at our institution and at six months postpartum; 50% of these patients were still symptomatic. We report favourable outcomes in 25 pregnant women with dilated cardiomyopathy who were managed by a multidisciplinary team.

Peripartum Outcomes and Anesthetic Management of Parturients With Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease or Pulmonary Hypertension

Peripartum Outcomes and Anesthetic Management of Parturients With Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease or Pulmonary Hypertension

Inadequate spinal anesthesia in a patient with marfan syndrome and dural ectasia.

Lumbosacral dural ectasia is frequently observed in patients with Marfan syndrome. Although neuraxial anesthesia is often used in peripartum anesthetic management, few reports describe the effects of dural ectasia on the spread and duration of neuraxial anesthesia. We report a case of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for a cesarean delivery in a patient with Marfan syndrome in whom complications probably related to dural ectasia occured.

Peripartum anesthetic management of a parturient with inherited factor v deficiency.

Inherited Factor V deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder. We describe the genetic analysis and anesthetic management of a parturient with severe Factor V deficiency who presented in spontaneous labor. Good hemostatic conditions were obtained with prophylactic fresh frozen plasma administration of 10 mL/kg. Detailed genetic analysis by next-generation sequencing identified several relevant mutations in the coding part of the Factor V (F5) gene in our patient, her parents, and the newborn.

Peripartum anesthetic management of patients with Factor XI deficiency

Factor XI deficiency is predominantly found in the Ashkenazi Jewish population with a prevalence of 9%, but also seen in other ethnicities. Little information is available on obstetric anesthesia management in women with Factor XI deficiency. Therefore, we undertook a study to evaluate obstetric, anesthetic and perinatal outcomes in parturients with Factor XI deficiency. A retrospective study was conducted with chart reviews from 1996 to 2011 resulted in 74 women with Factor XI level deficiency. We compared anesthetic and obstetric management in parturients with low (≤30%) level of Factor XI to those with higher levels. Ninety-one pregnancy outcomes were reviewed in these 74 women with Factor XI deficiency. Forty-three women had levels ≤30% in 46 labors while 31 women had levels >30% in 45 labors. Women with low levels of Factor XI were significantly more likely to receive FFP and less likely to receive neuroaxial anesthesia. There were no anesthetic complications and no difference in mode of delivery or neonatal outcomes. This study is the first step in building a national database for anesthetic cases and outcomes of parturients with Factor XI deficiency. Further efforts must be made to provide safe analgesia for these women.

Peripartum anesthetic management of renal transplant patients – a multicenter cohort study

As the number and success of renal transplantation has grown, there has been an increase in the number of renal transplant patients giving birth. To date, there has been no data on obstetric anesthesia management of these patients. The purpose of this study was to build an Israeli national database on parturients after renal transplant. A sixteen-year (calendar years 1996–2011) retrospective study was conducted at three major tertiary centers with a combined current birth rate of approximately 25 000 deliveries annually. We found 83 labors in 64 women. Forty-two percent of this population suffered from hypertension while 12.5% had diabetes. Forty-seven percent of women had a vaginal delivery while 53% of women had a cesarean section. The rate of epidural analgesia for labor was 59%, and rate of regional anesthesia during cesarean section was 75%. There were no anesthetic complications in any cases. Standard ASA monitoring was used in all cases except for one woman with severe hypertension who required an arterial line during her cesarean section. Forty-seven percent of newborn were under 37 weeks with average gestational week 36 ± 3 days and birth weight 2.5 ± 0.7 kg. Average Apgar was 8.4 ± 1.3 at one minute and 9.3 ± 0.7 at five minutes. There was one neonatal death in the CS group due to placental abruption. Patients after renal transplant can safely undergo birth and obstetric analgesia.

Anaesthetic Management of Emergency Caesarean Section in a Patient with Seizures and Likely Raised Intracranial Pressure Due to Tuberculous Meningitis

We report the anaesthetic management of a term pregnant woman with active tuberculous meningitis, who had experienced seizures, had signs of raised intracranial pressure and required emergency caesarean section. Peripartum anaesthetic management of a patient with tuberculous meningitis is a rare event.

Peripartum anesthetic management of a patient with brittle cornea syndrome

Brittle cornea syndrome (BCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disease that affects the connective tissue. The syndrome is caused by genetic changes in the 4.7-Mb interval between the D16S3423 and D16S3425 markers on the 16q24 chromosome and mutations in the Zinc-Finger 469 gene (ZNF469). BCS is characterized by thin and fragile cornea that tends to perforate spontaneously or as a result of minor trauma to the eye. In addition, the patient usually suffers from hearing loss, mental retardation, hyperextensibility of skin and joints, as well as varying degrees of scoliosis. This phenotypical expression presents an interesting challenge to anesthetic care. We briefly present the perioperative management of a patient with BCS who underwent three cesarean sections.

Peripartum anesthetic management of patients with aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective study and literature review

Background Anesthetic management of parturients with aortic stenosis is controversial. Early studies suggest maternal mortality was related to cardiac condition and anesthetic care. In this report, management of parturients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis in two institutions is compared, and published cases are reviewed. Methods Peripartum anesthetic management of all parturients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis who gave birth between 1990 and 2005 at our institutions, is described. Patients with mild or non-valvular aortic stenosis were excluded. Results There were 12 parturients, six with moderate and six with severe aortic stenosis. Two patients with moderate aortic stenosis were New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II, the others were asymptomatic. Five patients with severe aortic stenosis were symptomatic (NYHA classification II or III). Two patients with moderate and three with severe aortic stenosis underwent cesarean delivery; epidural anesthesia was used for two. Two patients with moderate and all with serious aortic stenosis were observed postpartum for 24 to 48 h in a high-dependency unit. There were no severe maternal or neonatal complications. Conclusions Carefully titrated regional analgesia is usually well tolerated in patients undergoing vaginal or cesarean delivery even in the presence of severe aortic stenosis. Standard monitoring is usually adequate for vaginal delivery, but invasive monitoring may facilitate management in some patients. An arterial line allows close monitoring of systemic blood pressure. Facilities for close 24-48-h post-partum observation should be available. A multidisciplinary approach is needed.

Peripartum anesthetic management of patients with Takayasu’s arteritis: case series and review

Takayasu or pulseless disease is a rare, chronic progressive inflammatory disease that causes thrombosis and occlusion of systemic and pulmonary arteries. Almost 80% of patients are women in their childbearing years. We present three patients with Takayasu’s disease who between them had six pregnancies and discuss them in the context of a review of previously published cases. Assessment of the parturient with Takayasu’s disease should include an evaluation of the extent of disease, including organ ischemia such as cardiac, renal, cerebral and limb. A multidisciplinary approach should be taken to optimize the parturient’s status and formulate a plan for delivery. Peripartum anesthetic management should include optimization of intravascular volume and appropriate monitoring, which may be difficult in the pulseless patient. A regional anesthetic technique may be preferred over general anesthesia to allow monitoring of the cerebral circulation. A slowly titrated regional technique may prevent hemodynamic instability. Patients should be closely monitored postpartum with attention to hypertensive or end organ complications.